GRVT vs Antarctic
A side-by-side comparison of two perpetual DEXs using the same sources and capture time. Larger is not automatically better: check fees, markets, collateral and access rules for your own use.
- GRVT holds 1.3× the open interest of Antarctic ($461.30M vs $352.16M).
- GRVT’s average open interest moved +13.1% over 30 days.
 GRVT | Antarctic | |
|---|---|---|
| Open interest | $461.30M | $352.16M |
| OI rank (of 91) | 5 | 6 |
| OI change · 30d | +13.1% | — |
| Volume · 24h | $499.82M | $316.26M |
| User fees · 30d | — | $2.69M |
| Fees change · 30d | — | — |
| Trend | Stable | Not enough data |
| Chains | GRVT | — |
| Model | Order book (hybrid) | Not classified yet |
| RWA markets | Yes | Not verified |
| Token | GRVT | None verified |
Open interest over time
- GRVT $461.30M
- Antarctic $352.16M
DefiLlama daily open interest. Missing days are left as gaps. The scale starts at zero.
Open interest and fees: DefiLlama, captured 08 Oct 2026 · 12:17 UTC. 24h volume: CoinGecko derivatives exchange data (rolling 24 hours, converted from BTC), captured 08 Oct 2026 · 12:16 UTC. Token prices and 30-day price change: CoinGecko, at the time shown on each venue page; a parent-project or chain token is labelled and is not evidence of a claim on exchange revenue. Changes compare the last 30 days with the previous 30 days (OI as a daily average, fees as a total) and need at least 95% daily coverage. A trend label needs the 30-day move to pass a threshold (OI ±25%, fees ±30%) on a minimum base (OI ≥ $5M, fees ≥ $100K per 30 days); with 90 days of history both horizons must agree. Venue-reported volume is not audited; ⚑ marks volume above 25× open interest. “—” means unavailable, never zero. Full method ↗