Hyperliquid vs Antarctic
A side-by-side comparison of two perpetual DEXs using the same sources and capture time. Larger is not automatically better: check fees, markets, collateral and access rules for your own use.
- Hyperliquid holds 23.6× the open interest of Antarctic ($8.33B vs $352.16M).
- Over the last 30 days traders paid $87.56M in fees on Hyperliquid and $2.69M on Antarctic.
- Hyperliquid’s average open interest moved +23.8% over 30 days.
 Hyperliquid | Antarctic | |
|---|---|---|
| Open interest | $8.33B | $352.16M |
| OI rank (of 91) | 1 | 6 |
| OI change · 30d | +23.8% | — |
| Volume · 24h | $8.44B | $316.26M |
| User fees · 30d | $87.56M | $2.69M |
| Fees change · 30d | +4.5% | — |
| Trend | Stable | Not enough data |
| Chains | Hyperliquid L1 | — |
| Model | Order book on its own L1 | Not classified yet |
| RWA markets | Yes | Not verified |
| Token | HYPE | None verified |
Open interest over time
- Hyperliquid $8.33B
- Antarctic $352.16M
DefiLlama daily open interest. Missing days are left as gaps. The scale starts at zero.
Open interest and fees: DefiLlama, captured 08 Oct 2026 · 12:17 UTC. 24h volume: CoinGecko derivatives exchange data (rolling 24 hours, converted from BTC), captured 08 Oct 2026 · 12:16 UTC. Token prices and 30-day price change: CoinGecko, at the time shown on each venue page; a parent-project or chain token is labelled and is not evidence of a claim on exchange revenue. Changes compare the last 30 days with the previous 30 days (OI as a daily average, fees as a total) and need at least 95% daily coverage. A trend label needs the 30-day move to pass a threshold (OI ±25%, fees ±30%) on a minimum base (OI ≥ $5M, fees ≥ $100K per 30 days); with 90 days of history both horizons must agree. Venue-reported volume is not audited; ⚑ marks volume above 25× open interest. “—” means unavailable, never zero. Full method ↗