Antarctic vs Vest
A side-by-side comparison of two perpetual DEXs using the same sources and capture time. Larger is not automatically better: check fees, markets, collateral and access rules for your own use.
- Antarctic holds 3.7× the open interest of Vest ($352.16M vs $93.95M).
- Over the last 30 days traders paid $2.69M in fees on Antarctic and $33.36K on Vest.
- Vest’s average open interest moved +9.4% over 30 days.
| Antarctic |  Vest | |
|---|---|---|
| Open interest | $352.16M | $93.95M |
| OI rank (of 91) | 6 | 12 |
| OI change · 30d | — | +9.4% |
| Volume · 24h | $316.26M | $113.57M |
| User fees · 30d | $2.69M | $33.36K |
| Fees change · 30d | — | -49.2% |
| Trend | Not enough data | Stable |
| Chains | — | — |
| Model | Not classified yet | Not classified yet |
| RWA markets | Not verified | Yes |
| Token | None verified | None verified |
Open interest over time
- Antarctic $352.16M
- Vest $93.95M
DefiLlama daily open interest. Missing days are left as gaps. The scale starts at zero.
Open interest and fees: DefiLlama, captured 08 Oct 2026 · 12:17 UTC. 24h volume: CoinGecko derivatives exchange data (rolling 24 hours, converted from BTC), captured 08 Oct 2026 · 12:16 UTC. Token prices and 30-day price change: CoinGecko, at the time shown on each venue page; a parent-project or chain token is labelled and is not evidence of a claim on exchange revenue. Changes compare the last 30 days with the previous 30 days (OI as a daily average, fees as a total) and need at least 95% daily coverage. A trend label needs the 30-day move to pass a threshold (OI ±25%, fees ±30%) on a minimum base (OI ≥ $5M, fees ≥ $100K per 30 days); with 90 days of history both horizons must agree. Venue-reported volume is not audited; ⚑ marks volume above 25× open interest. “—” means unavailable, never zero. Full method ↗