Hyperliquid vs Jupiter Perps
A side-by-side comparison of two perpetual DEXs using the same sources and capture time. Larger is not automatically better: check fees, markets, collateral and access rules for your own use.
- Hyperliquid holds 152.9× the open interest of Jupiter Perps ($8.33B vs $54.46M).
- Over the last 30 days traders paid $87.56M in fees on Hyperliquid and $7.93M on Jupiter Perps.
- Hyperliquid’s average open interest moved +23.8% over 30 days.
- Jupiter Perps’s average open interest moved +15.4% over 30 days.
 Hyperliquid |  Jupiter Perps | |
|---|---|---|
| Open interest | $8.33B | $54.46M |
| OI rank (of 50) | 1 | 18 |
| OI change · 30d | +23.8% | +15.4% |
| Volume · 24h | $8.29B | — |
| User fees · 30d | $87.56M | $7.93M |
| Fees change · 30d | +4.5% | -14.2% |
| Trend | Stable | Stable |
| Chains | Hyperliquid L1 | Solana |
| Model | Order book on its own L1 | Liquidity pool (JLP) with oracle pricing; Beta markets on the GUM order book |
| RWA markets | Yes | Yes |
| Token | HYPE | JUP |
| Base trading fees | Taker 0.045% · maker 0.015% ↗ | Taker 0.06% · maker 0.06% ↗ |
| Max leverage | 40× ↗ | 250× ↗ |
| Collateral | USDC (core perps); HIP-3 dexes may use other quote assets ↗ | JLP markets: SOL/wETH/wBTC for longs, USDC for shorts (any SPL token auto-swapped); Beta markets: USDC ↗ |
| KYC | Not required ↗ | Not verified |
| Referral program | Yes. Benefit for the referred trader: “Using a referral code will give you a 4% discount on your fees for your first $25M in volume.” ↗ | Not verified |
Open interest over time
- Hyperliquid $8.33B
- Jupiter Perps $54.46M
DefiLlama daily open interest. Missing days are left as gaps. The scale starts at zero.
Open interest and fees: DefiLlama, captured 08 Oct 2026 · 14:43 UTC. 24h volume: CoinGecko derivatives exchange data (rolling 24 hours, converted from BTC), captured 08 Oct 2026 · 14:43 UTC. Token prices and 30-day price change: CoinGecko, at the time shown on each venue page; a parent-project or chain token is labelled and is not evidence of a claim on exchange revenue. Changes compare the last 30 days with the previous 30 days (OI as a daily average, fees as a total) and need at least 95% daily coverage. A trend label needs the 30-day move to pass a threshold (OI ±25%, fees ±30%) on a minimum base (OI ≥ $5M, fees ≥ $100K per 30 days); with 90 days of history both horizons must agree. Venue-reported volume is not audited; ⚑ marks volume above 25× open interest. “—” means unavailable, never zero. Full method ↗